Samsung's Galaxy Note 7 apology is appreciated, but transparency and details about what went wrong will go farther for the brand.
2016-11-09 08:37:49
alice
12
That transparency will do more to repair Samsung's brand hit than any apology will. Here's what questions I'd like answered:
How did the handoff between the players in the supply chain lead to the Galaxy Note 7 battery issue?
What processes will be changed?
How does Samsung's post mortem apply to the smartphone industry overall?
The actual cause of the battery issue and the role of hardware and software integration?
Where did Samsung controls and management decision making fall short and what's being done to fix those process shortfalls?
Add it up and the investigation into the device and its parts are important. The processes and learning for the rest of the industry will be just as important.
-
IQMS Observes Signs of Strong Growth in Plastics Manufacturing at K 2016 Show[2016/10/26]
-
Henrik Fisker is using a revolutionary new battery to power his Tesla killer[2016/10/17]
-
The idea of a national ripple effect didn’t seem to much concern Phil Rozenski, policy chair of the American Progressive Bag Alliance.[2016/11/14]
-
New Power[2016/10/27]
-
Mopie Powerstation Review: A Smartphone's Secret To All-Day Battery Life[2016/09/26]
-
Batterty Energy Tech In Paradise [2016/11/18]
-
How safe are portable battery packs?[2016/10/21]
-
Battery power unviable alternative to traditional energy sources[2016/10/25]
-
How to stop your smartphone battery from exploding[2016/09/30]
-
Japanese battery maker TDK reels from Samsung Note 7 debacle[2016/10/12]
-
BLOG For want of a better battery: Bob McDonald[2016/10/15]
-
AM Alert: Plastic bags’ environmental impact debated[2016/10/18]
-
Microsoft remains silent as Surface Pro 3 battery woes pile up[2016/10/08]